North Korean Missiles; Sanctions Against Iran; Is America Out of Order?>
The problem in this world today is that we have an anarchistic chaos of political groups and institutions; each one a law unto themselves. Consequently, some countries, America for example, assumes the role of Billy Big Bollocks, and takes it on itself to dictate what other countries can or cannot do, or who may be in control of them. This makes other governments nervous of America and drives them to establish a deterring arsenal of weapons in order to secure themselves and their positions. This is creating a lot of tension in the world, of which the situation with North Korea is a prime example.
The question must be asked: How can one country, with an arsenal of thousands of nuclear weapons, assert that other countries, eg, North Korea and Iran, cannot have any? Countries can either have nuclear weapons or they cannot. One rule for all, not one rule for one country and another rule for everyone else.
The system of international defence and control that is proposed in this website, does away both with the need for any nation to take on the role of being Billy Big Bollocks and protects any other nation from such arrogance.
We believe that within this website lies the only solution to the creation of World Peace
So far, nobody has shown us to the contrary
You may not have time to read all this website in one go. Why not save it to file or add it to favourites?
Welcome to Worldpeace.org.uk
|The World's Problems||Introduction||Your say|
|Facts and Figures||1) First things First||What can we do to help?|
|World Peace does not equal World Government||2) Plan for Peace||Program for Peace|
|3) The Status Quo|
|Jihad and Armageddon||4) The Crucial Point|
|5) The Set up|
|6) Making it Happen|
|7) Cases in Hand|
|Sword of Peace||A Better Way||Is Blue the Colour of Peace in Palestine?||ENIA (Every Nation International Alliance)|
|U.N.Contacts||List of M.E.P's||Contacts for Africa|
The World's Problems
No-one can solve all the world's problems. To try would be to dissipate one's energies and achieve nothing. The best thing we can do is to focus all our efforts and attention on just one problem and hope our endeavours will make a difference to it. That immediately creates the dilemma of which particular problem to solve. It may be a matter of personal preference, or it may be a matter of perceived priority. Given that the best way to solve a large number of problems is to solve one at a time, which one of the following major international problems would you choose to resolve first?