;

North Korean Missiles; Sanctions Against Iran; Is America Out of Order?

>

The problem in this world today is that we have an anarchistic chaos of political groups and institutions; each one a law unto themselves. Consequently, some countries, America for example, assumes the role of Billy Big Bollocks, and takes it on itself to dictate what other countries can or cannot do, or who may be in control of them. This makes other governments nervous of America and drives them to establish a deterring arsenal of weapons in order to secure themselves and their positions. This is creating a lot of tension in the world, of which the situation with North Korea is a prime example.

The question must be asked: How can one country, with an arsenal of thousands of nuclear weapons, assert that other countries, eg, North Korea and Iran, cannot have any? Countries can either have nuclear weapons or they cannot. One rule for all, not one rule for one country and another rule for everyone else.

The system of international defence and control that is proposed in this website, does away both with the need for any nation to take on the role of being Billy Big Bollocks and protects any other nation from such arrogance.

We believe that within this website lies the only solution to the creation of World Peace

So far, nobody has shown us to the contrary

You may not have time to read all this website in one go. Why not save it to file or add it to favourites?

 

Welcome to Worldpeace.org.uk

 

 

Site Index:

 
     
The World's Problems Introduction Your say
Facts and Figures 1)  First things First What can we do to help?
World Peace does not equal World Government 2)  Plan for Peace Program for Peace

3)  The Status Quo
Jihad and Armageddon 4)  The Crucial Point
  5)  The Set up  
  6)  Making it Happen  
  7)  Cases in Hand  
     
 

Related Links:

 
     
Sword of Peace A Better Way Is Blue the Colour of Peace in Palestine? ENIA (Every Nation International Alliance)
U.N.Contacts List of M.E.P's Contacts for Africa

 

 The World's Problems

No-one can solve all the world's problems. To try would be to dissipate one's energies and achieve nothing. The best thing we can do is to focus all our efforts and attention on just one problem and hope our endeavours will make a difference to it. That immediately creates the dilemma of which particular problem to solve. It may be a matter of personal preference, or it may be a matter of perceived priority. Given that the best way to solve a large number of problems is to solve one at a time, which one of the following major international problems would you choose to resolve first?  

 

        Global warming              Natural disasters
   
        International terrorism            Deforestation
   
        Endangered species           Pollution
   
        Poverty           Child exploitation
   
        Contaminated drinking water           Illegal drug production
   
        Oppression of women           Famine
   
        Overpopulation           Energy crisis
   
        Economic Crisis           World health problems
   

                                                                                                                         

It's not an easy choice to make is it? The difficult thing about it is that by selecting one option the others are left neglected and unresolved. The one thing that all these problems have in common is that the more money, resources and manpower you allocate to them the greater improvement you are likely to effect as a result.

Now let us consider another world problem: international conflict and the escalation of arms. This problem is converse to the others in that the more money, resources and manpower you allocate to it the WORSE it gets:- one side engages ten thousand men in battle so the other side engages fifteen; one side spends two million on weapons of mass destruction so the other side spends three. The more armies and weapons there are the more dangerous the world is, and it all has the potential of going up in smoke and achieving nothing except destruction!

If the problem of potential conflict could be resolved to the extent that all this spending on arms and manpower was no longer necessary, then not only would some of the other problems be prevented from happening in the first place, but also all the money, manpower and other resources allocated to (so called) defence would then be freed up and made potentially available to any number of the other world problems we have been talking about.

                                                    Click here for:                  

Therefore our submission is that given any person can only really devote their attention to solving one major problem in the world, then the preferential choice for that problem should be to attend to the matter of international conflict and world peace, because of the beneficial effect on all the other world problems. That certainly is our choice, and we hope that a sufficient number of people reading this will agree with us:

 

               I agree that world peace should be the issue of priority to deal with (proceed).

               I prefer to devote my attention to solving one of the other important issues (exit).

 

There are eight more pages of text before you get to the active part of this website

Send your comments to : Comments@worldpeace.org.uk     (Please don't send attachments as we never open them).

Don't forget to find out what YOU can do to help!